IT'S DIFFICULT to really know where to start in describing Lord Christopher Monckton, one of the planet's most outspoken deniers of the risks of human-caused climate change.
Now that's pretty impressive stuff. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change gathers and summarises the world's research on climate change.
I wondered how one might be "appointed" as an "expert reviewer", so I asked the secretariat at the IPCC about the process.
Here's what they told me (my bolding).
Anyone can register as an expert reviewer on the open online registration systems set up by the working groups. All registrants that provide the information requested and confirm their scientific expertise via a self-declaration of expertise are accepted for participation in the review. They are invited to list publications, but that is not a requirement and the section can be left blank when registering. There is no appointment.
Hang on. No appointment? But Lord Monckton just.. but he says that he.. right there, he just said he was appointed, all official like.
Now there are some appointed spots within the IPCC report-writing process. Lead Authors and Contributing Lead Authors are approved by the IPCC bureau, as are Review Editors. Contibuting Authors are generally invited by the Lead Authors.
But reading the response from the IPCC, it sounds as though even I could get a gig as an "expert reviewer". It would make a cracking addition to most people's CV.
Anyone out there who might be thinking about applying for a job that you just know in your heart of hearts you're not qualified to do, might want to think about asking Lord Christopher Monckton for a bit of guidance.
Because when it comes to puffing out your CV, the non-Member of the House of Lords is highly skilled.
His modus operandi (aside from speaking Latin in interviews) appears to be that the more spectacular the claim, the less likely people are to disbelieve you. Like climate change science being a plot to "shut down the west", for example.
So here, just a small handful of some of Monckton's greatest hits.
Claimed to be a member of the House of Lords, even after House of Lords officials told him that he's not a member of the House of Lords.
Claimed to have penned an article during the Falkland's War which was read out by the BBC's World Service Argentinian broadcasts, when the BBC World Service didn't have an Argentinian service or do any Argentinian broadcasts.
Claimed he was forced to sell his home in order to pay $1 million prize money tied to a board game he had designed. He later admitted he made up the story to boost sales.
Is this similar to the Michael Mann Nobel peace prize that 'wasn't'? That poor guy is going to further ruin his own reputation with his latest court case.
You have clearly got hold of the wrong end of the stick, but that is common for those who inhabit WeUseWishfulThinking, Cardinal Puff and the Cod-piece.
Hank_, that's kinda like throwing up a straw man to deflect attention from the lies on Monckton's CV.
I suppose if I said that was typical behavior of an AGW denier you'd throw up another straw man by claiming I was accusing you of Holocaust denial, but then we all know how much you AGW deniers hate that word, because it is the mot juste for what you do.
Democracy is utterly dependent upon an electorate that is accurately informed. In promoting climate change denial (and often denying their responsibility for doing so) industry has done more than endanger the environment. It has undermined democracy.
There is a vast difference between putting forth a point of view, honestly held, and intentionally sowing the seeds of confusion. Free speech does not include the right to deceive. Deception is not a point of view. And the right to disagree does not include a right to intentionally subvert the public awareness.
You don't see this every day. President Barack Obama used Twitter today to call out climate deniers in Congress who are blocking political action to address climate change.
The tweet links to this video released by Organizing for Action, the 501(c)(4) campaign group that promotes the President's national agenda.
Comments
Kinda like Mike Mann?
Is this similar to the Michael Mann Nobel peace prize that 'wasn't'? That poor guy is going to further ruin his own reputation with his latest court case.
Hank_ engages in a Monkton manoeuvre
Hank_
You have clearly got hold of the wrong end of the stick, but that is common for those who inhabit WeUseWishfulThinking, Cardinal Puff and the Cod-piece.
The Rabett has the take on this here,
http://rabett.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/eli-gets-email.html
and here:
http://rabett.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/eli-gets-even-more-email.html
there, helped you out if you have the comprehension skills to interpret all that correctly.
Re. Kinda like Mike Mann?
Hank_, that's kinda like throwing up a straw man to deflect attention from the lies on Monckton's CV.
I suppose if I said that was typical behavior of an AGW denier you'd throw up another straw man by claiming I was accusing you of Holocaust denial, but then we all know how much you AGW deniers hate that word, because it is the mot juste for what you do.