BREAKING NEWS from the Newsbusters Global Warming Denier Clearinghouse!
Well, it was BREAKING! yesterday, anyway. Noel Sheppard posted:
โฆ six months [after Al Gore and the IPCC won the Nobel Peace Prize], a fellow Nobel Peace Prize recipient is part of a group asking the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change โadmit that there is no observational evidence in measured data going back 22,000 years or even millions of years that CO2 levels (whether from man or nature) have driven or are driving world temperatures.โ
The meandering nonsense in the letter that Newbusters quotes includes โIf you [the IPCC] believe there is evidence of the CO2 [climate change] driver theory in the available data please present a graph of itโฆ [M]ore recent data shows that in the opposite sense to IPCC predictions world temperatures have not risen and indeed have fallen over the past 10 years while CO2 levels have risen dramatically.โ
Never mind that you can find plenty of relevant graphs and data on the IPCC website.
Thatโs not the point here.
First of all, we have the usual denier modus operandi known as โscience by letter or petitionโ versus โscience by peer review.โ The individuals who signed the letter did not present a peer-reviewed scientific study for consideration; itโs more of a pub conversation over a few web links than โscienceโ.
Secondly โ and most importantly โ it is becoming patently clear that Mr. Sheppard cannot use Google. Letโs take a trip on the โInternetsโ and see exactly who the letterโs signatories are.
The โNobel Prize-Winning Peacekeeperโ to whom Sheppard refers is Svend Hendriksen (Nobel Peace Prize 1988 , awarded to UN Peacekeeping Forces. I assume Hendriksen was one of the peacekeepers).
It turns out that Hendriksen is the publisher of a website, โThe Greenland Art Reviewโ, in which he presents some of his art history theories, as well as his views as a global warming denialist.
He presents a rather, um, unusual analysis of An Inconvenient Truth. He claims that the film has โRorschach phenomenon and hidden messagesโ (see the pdfs on his site, as well as the image linked in his art forum post here). To say the least, itโs unconventional, verging on the bizarre.
As if that wasnโt enough to discredit the letter to the IPCC, the other signatories donโt help its credibility either.
Hans Schreuder is an analytical chemist who runs ilovemycarbondioxide.com.
He rants about graffiti tagging, tells us to โbe good, PLANT TREES, NOT BOMBS,โ and says that โthere is absolutely NO proof whatsoever that carbon dioxide has any influence on our climate, not even a minute one. ALL โproofโ is based on theories and computer models, not actual direct evidence โ cause there ainโt none!โ It is not clear exactly how his โcalculationsโ (much less, his education in analytical chemistry) are relevant to the โanalysisโ presented in the letter.
Piers Corbyn is the proprietor of weatheraction.com. His specialty is predicting the weather as far as a year ahead of time; you can even buy his horoscope forecasts. His techniques are apparently proprietary.
And last, but not least, is Dr. Don Parkes, โProf. Em. Human Ecology, Australiaโ. A little digging reveals a few publications. Human Ecology is an interesting and relevant area of study (especially in light of the worldโs changing climate), but itโs a stretch as to how Parkesโ academic career applies to the claims presented in the letter.
The letter was copied to two members of the Global Warming Denier Hall of Shame: John Christy and Roy Spencer.
Hardly a case of scientific peer review.
More like โpreaching to your own choirโ, and regurgitation by Mr. Sheppard.
Shameful, predictable, and tiresome.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts