IF there was a prize for the most esoteric and stratospherically "out there" theory against human caused climate change, then surely Thomas Watson would be in line for this particular gong.
In an interview in January for the US-based internet radio show "It's Rainmaking Time", this 83-year-old Australian from Victoria told presenter Kim Greenhouse that carbon dioxide had nothing to do with climate change and that instead, natural variations in "magnetism" were responsible.
Watson said: "The term...
read more























Comments
That would be the paper which
That would be the paper which agrees with Mann et al for China in the same period.
Oops. That's gotta smart.
You might want to actually
You might want to actually read the paper, rather than rely on a press release that does not even claim the MWP is warmer than today
Perhaps you should learn to
Perhaps you should learn to read a graph. All the above papers include graphs of temperature vs time. In all the graphs, the MWP is warmer than today, and the LIA is cooler than today.
Just the opposite of what Mann et al claim in the famous Hockey stick hypothesis.
outlier
no james, in that study they used just 10 samples. and there was one sample that was so out of whack that they ....used it anyway.....i think it had something to do with yamal....oh no wait i think i have it mixed up with something else...cant put my finger on it....
I actually read the paper. I
I actually read the paper. I actually know what "BP" means. And even better, I know that a warm period 800-1000 AD in reconstruction A does not correspond to a warm period 1000-1200 AD in reconstruction B.
Total fabrication by 47 varieties
'Perhaps you should learn to read a graph. All the above papers include graphs of temperature vs time. In all the graphs, the MWP is warmer than today, and the LIA is cooler than today.'
How many times does it have to be pointed out to you that the so called MWP (not even the correct acronym - but) was a moving regional phenomenon, i.e. higher temperatures were not consistent in either place or time.
The LIA is well understood and even that period included areas and times where there were periods of high temperatures and droughts. Another interest of mine is maritime history and especially the wooden walled navies. One tends to learn from the histories of ship building about the problems which weather threw up for those sourcing and seasoning timber and using it for building.
You people are just so ignorant.
'Just the opposite of what Mann et al claim in the famous Hockey stick hypothesis.'
That, by now, has to be an outright lie. Shame on you.
Actually the outright lies
Actually the outright lies are that Manns Hokey Schtick was anything but fraud and that the MWP was not global.
But seriously that has been shown sooooo many times now it is simple accepted.
Where has it been shown?
Where has it been shown? co2science.org by any chance?
a) The study was NOT WRITTEN
a) The study was NOT WRITTEN BY GREENPEACE!
b) oh wait, no further points necessary. Lynas embarrassed himself.
It was quite telling Lynas (pro-nuke) went after Greenpeace (anti-nuke), and failed to get all upset about the Lead author from the Petroleum Corporation of Jamaica on the same chapter (or those from a wide range of other companies on other chapters).
Not possible. Soon is far to
Not possible.
Soon is far to honest to word for big green.
I'm betting that half the money Soon takes in ....
goes to the Harvard-Smithsonian. Way to go Greenpeace. You're stupid.
Let's not forget Willie Soon
Let's not forget Willie Soon received $60,000 for consulting, from Frontiers for Freedom in financial year ending 2004.
http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2004/541/773/2004-541773197-01fbf28b-9.pdf
Willie Soon funding (George Soros?)WTF?
Looks like he also received funding from Soros in the mid-90's
300 large
i wonder where the $300,000,000 algore dished out went to?
Pages