Fri, 2006-01-20 14:24Jim Hoggan
Jim Hoggan's picture

Crikey: A Balancing View on Lovelock's Apocalypse

For all of you who are still depressed from the earlier Lovelock post, warning that we have already inflicted fatal damage to the earth's climate, check out this post for a slightly more optimistic view of humankind's ability to respond to climate change.
Fri, 2006-01-20 14:10Jim Hoggan
Jim Hoggan's picture

Former EPA Chiefs Bash Bush

Six former chiefs of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, who gathered this week to celebrate the agency's 35th birthday, took some time off to bash the current administration for its myopic position on climate change.

"We need leadership, and I don't think we're getting it," said Russell Train, EPA chief under Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, talking about global warming. "To sit back and just push it away and say we'll deal with it sometime down the road is dishonest to the people and self-destructive."

According to reports only  the current chief administrator stood up to defend President George W. Bush's record.
Fri, 2006-01-20 11:34Richard Littlemore
Richard Littlemore's picture

Canada to Bail Out of Kyoto Agreement

Conservative Party Leader (and prime minister in waiting) Stephen Harper appeared to confirm last night in a CBC interview that he will remove Canada as a signatory to the Kyoto Agreement should he win election on Monday, Feb. 23, 2006.

Harper argues - rightly - that Canada wasted the last decade while the Liberal government of then-prime minister Jean Chretien dithered over how to achieve Kyoto targets. Chretien's biggest fear during the late '90s was that he would further alienate Albertans, whose robust economy rests heavily on fossil fuels. Chretien was also denied his usual ally in Ontario, as the then-Conservative provincial government refused to participate in any negotiations on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Thu, 2006-01-19 14:58Ross Gelbspan
Ross Gelbspan's picture

The Wall Street Journal Embarrasses Itself Again

In a Jan. 19 editorial, titled "Kyoto's Big Con," the Wall Street Journal declared:

"The U.S. dropped its signature from Kyoto because arbitrary emissions targets are both pointless and economically damaging. No proof exists that lower emissions reduce global warming. The idea that human activity influences climate change one way or another is far from proven, given the overwhelming role nature itself plays in atmospheric changes. And if the warming trend of recent decades continues -- by no means a certainty -- it might well be a boon to humanity."

Wed, 2006-01-18 15:51Jim Hoggan
Jim Hoggan's picture

Further Dissembling by The Australian

Kudos to the folks at PR Watch for tracking down this bit of info. It appears that the editors of The Australian (about whom we opined critically just a couple of days ago) have supplemented their own badly grounded science with the meanderings of an industry flak intent upon muddying the waters on the issue of climate change.

Pages

Subscribe to DeSmogBlog