Judith Curry

Judith Curry


  • PhD, Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago (1982).
  • B.S., Geography, Northern Illinois University (1974).
Source: [1]


Judith A. Curry is the chairman of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology and has held this position since 2002. Judith Curry writes and speaks prolifically on the climate change issue, and runs the blog Climate Etc.

Judith Curry has been invited by Republicans to testify at climate change hearings regarding alleged uncertainties regarding man-made climate change. She has also participated in a variety of blogs in the skeptical community including Climate Audit, the Air Vent and the Black-board. 

Curry has been criticized by climate scientists for her climate outreach in the blogosphere based on assertions not necessarily supported by the evidence: particularly that the “climate always changes.” [6] Scientist Mark Serreze, director of the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado at Boulder, points out that “Climate doesn't change all by itself for no good reason. Something has to force it.” [6]

When she was questioned about potential conflicts of interest, this was her response to the Scientific American: [2]
“I do receive some funding from the fossil fuel industry. My company…does [short-term] hurricane forecasting…for an oil company, since 2007. During this period I have been both a strong advocate for the IPCC, and more recently a critic of the IPCC, there is no correlation of this funding with my public statements.”

Stance on Climate Change

Key Quotes

April 19, 2014

Curry, in her blog Climate Etc, publishes a post titled, “In defense of free speech.” Within it, she writes:

“I am broadly concerned about the slow death of free speech, but particularly in universities and also with regards to the climate change debate.” [9]

April 25, 2013

“If all other things remain equal, it is clear that adding more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere will warm the planet. However the real difficulty is that nothing remains equal, and reliable prediction of the impact of carbon dioxide on the climate requires that we understand natural climate variability properly. Until we understand natural climate variability better, we cannot reliably infer sensitivity to greenhouse gas forcing or understand its role in influencing extreme weather events. […] While 20th century climate change is most often explained in terms of external forcing, with natural internal variability providing high frequency ‘noise,’ the role of large multidecadal oscillations is receiving increasing attention.” [4]

October 28, 2012

“The manufactured consensus of the IPCC has had the unintended consequences of distorting the science, elevating the voices of scientists that dispute the consensus, and motivating actions by the consensus scientists and their supporters that have diminished the public’s trust in the IPCC.” [3]

Key Deeds

September 25, 2014

Judith Curry attends the “At the Crossroads; Energy & Climate Policy Summit” in Houston, Texas, hosted by the Texas Public Policy Foundation and The Heritage Foundation. Spencer presents in “Panel I: The State of the Science,” with Roy Spencer and Harold Doiron. [16]

March 9, 2014

Judith Curry publishes a post on her blog, Climate Etc, titled, “Positioning skeptics.” In the post, she declares her happiness in her decision to write the Foreword for Lewis and Krok's GWPF report, after initially “thinking twice about writing a Foreword for a GWPF (Global Warming Policy Foundation) publication,” noting that she “tries to stay away from organizations with political perspectives on global warming.” [14],[15]

January 16, 2014

Judith Curry testified before The Committee on Environment and Public Works of the U.S. Senate in a hearing titled, “Review of the President's Climate Action Plan.” According to her testimony, the “evidence reported by the IPCC AR5 weakens the case for human factors dominating climate change in the 20th and early 21st centuries.” Additionally, Curry states that she is “increasingly concerned that both the climate change problem and its solution have been vastly oversimplified.” [13]

April 25, 2013

Judith Curry testified before the Senate Subcommittee on Environment in a hearing titled “Policy Relevant Climate Issues in Context.” According to her testimony, there is still uncertainty whether carbon dioxide impacts the climate until “we better understand natural climate variability.” [4]

Prominent climate change skeptic Bjorn Lomborg also testified at the hearing.

October, 2012

Judith Curry is the co-author of a paper titled “Climate change: no consensus on consensus” which provides an overview of critiques of the IPCC consensus process.

According to the paper's introduction, “It is difficult to avoid concluding that the IPCC consensus is manufactured and that the existence of this consensus does not lend intellectual substance to their conclusions.” [3]

October 10, 2007

Curry publishes an opinion piece in The Washington Post titled, “Cooler Heads and Climate Change,” in response to Bjorn Lomborg's opinion piece, “Chill out,” written just three days prior. In it, she states that Lomborg “rightly notes” that climate change skepticism is “no longer focused on whether it the earth is getting warmer (it is) or whether humans are contributing to it (we are). The current debate is about whether warming matters, and whether we can afford to do anything about it.” [12]

Curry goes on to say that Lomborg has placed himself directly in the skeptics camp, but notes that “he has some of his facts wrong.” Among the incorrect facts is Lomborg's assertion that the Kangerlussuaq Glacier in Greenland is “inconveniently growing.” Curry points out that the glacier is not growing, but rather, “simply spilling into the sea,” citing NASA research. [12]

In her closing paragraph, Curry states, “There is no easy solution to this problem [global warming]… But I have yet to see an option that is worse than ignoring the risk of global warming and doing nothing.” [12]


  • Climate Forecast Applications Network (CFAN— President and Co-Founder. [5]



  1. JUDITH A. CURRY,” CV at the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology. Accessed April 27, 2013. 

  2. Michael D. Lemonick. “Climate Heretic: Judith Curry Turns on Her Colleagues,” Scientific American, October 25, 2010.

  3. Judith Curry. “Climate change: no consensus on consensus,” Climate Etc., October 28, 2012.

  4. Judith A. Curry. “Hearing on 'Policy Relevant Climate Issues in Context'” (PDF), Committee on Space, Science and Technology, April 25, 2013.

  5. About,” Climate Forecast Applications Network. Accessed April 27, 2013.

  6. Joe Romm, “Judith Curry Abandons Science,” Climate Progress, November 11, 2010.

  7. Judith Curry and Peter J. Webster, “Thermodynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans,” International Geophysics Series: Volume 65, February 13, 1999.

  8. Judith Curry, “FIRE Arctic Clouds Experiment,” Journal of Geophysical Research Volume 106, Part 14, 2001.

  9. Judith Curry,” SourceWatch.

  10. Judith Curry,” Wikipedia. 

  11. Judith Curry, “In defense of free speech,” Climate Etc, April 19, 2014.

  12. Judith Curry, “Cooler Heads and Climate Change,” The Washington Post Opinions, October 10, 2007.

  13. Judith Curry, “Hearing on 'Review of the President's Climate Action Plan,'” Committee on Environment and Public Works of The United States Senate, January 16, 2014. Archived May 21, 2014.

  14. Judith Curry, “Positioning skeptics,” Climate Etc, March 9, 2014.

  15. Judith Curry, “Lewis and Krok: Climate less sensititve to CO2 than models suggest,” Climate Etc, March 5, 2014.

  16. Judith Curry. Speakers,” At the Crossroads; Energy & Climate Policy Summit, Texas Public Policy Foundation, The Heritage Foundation, September 25/26, 2014.

Willie Soon climate science denial

“The science that Willie Soon does is almost pointless.” - NASA climate scientist Gavin Schmidt, to the New York Times

Recent revelations regarding Smithsonian scientist ...

read more