No apology is owed Dr. S. Fred Singer, and none will be forthcoming
Dr. Singer goes on to “demand a full retraction and apology from the blog,” and he asks that we publish the following statement: “Dr. Singer and SEPP (Science & Environmental Policy Project) have no connection whatsoever with the tobacco industry, now or in the past. As a matter of policy, SEPP does not solicit funds or other kinds of support from any industry or from government, but relies on tax-deductible donations from foundations and individuals in many countries. Further, Dr. Singer serves on the Advisory Board of the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH), an organization that has a strong anti-smoking position.”
We have no comment on the ACSH, but Dr. Singer’s main point – that he has “no connection whatsoever with the tobacco industry, now or in the past” – strains credulity.
For example, here is the link to a memo in which an official from the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution solicits $20,000 from the Tobacco Institute for the preparation of a “research” paper challenging the health effects of second-hand smoke, and suggesting that Dr. Singer be retained to write the report. Here is the link to a letter thanking the Tobacco Institute for $20,000 intended “to support our research and education projects.” Here is a research paper, just as described in the earlier memo, with Dr. Singer’s name as the author. And here is another Tobacco Institute memo, reporting on Dr. Singer’s appearance with two Congressional Representatives releasing the paper to the media.
More to the point, for a blog about the dubious public relations tactics being used to skew the climate change debate, is Dr. Singer’s previous statements about his involvement with the oil industry.
For example, on Feb. 21, 2001, Dr. Singer wrote to the Washington Post, saying: “As for full disclosure: My résumé clearly states that I consulted for several oil companies on the subject of oil pricing, some 20 years ago, after publishing a monograph on the subject. “My connection to oil during the past decade is as a Wesson Fellow at the Hoover Institution; the Wesson money derives from salad oil.” At the time that Dr. Singer wrote this letter, ExxonMobil was listing him on their website as a recipient of US $10,000 in direct funding and as a participant in an event to which ExMo contributed $65,000. Our colleague Ross Gelbspan reported all this in The Nation in an article that can be found here.
This is a stark illustration of what we are up against in the climate change "debate." On one hand you have the world's most accomplished and reputable scientists - more than 2,000 of whom have submitted research to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - carefully weighing every pronouncement for accuracy and subjecting all of their research to peer-review before announcing it publicly. These people agree, unreservedly, that climate change is happening and is caused by human activity.
On the other hand, you have a huge and expensive public relations campaign denying that scientific consensus. This campaign is largely financed with money from energy companies like ExxonMobil, which is then lightly laundered through "think tanks" like the Alexis de Tocqueville Institution or the Competitive Enterprise Institute or through industry front groups like Dr. Singer's own Science & Environmental Policy Project. The money is then passed along to "experts" like Dr. Singer, who seems happy enough to be paid for his services, even if he is reticent to admit it after the fact.
There should be no doubt in this conversation where the weight of credibility lies.
tmipsrnx uybrksifd mhcg lbyqjzs riyfxj tzpohedwj gklmf
Automakers are in trouble the world over. It isn't just American automakers like GM and Chrysler that are asking for a bailout. Also the housing bubble bursting led to a drastic drop in demand, and prices, and even though you can't buy a house with payday loans alone, you can get one for dirt cheap (or at least what passes for it in California) if you can get the financing. California has been hard hit by the housing crisis, having one of the most expensive real estate markets in the nation. (Where else can you pay $400,000 for a house – and still live next door to Crips?) Regardless, if you're looking for cheap real estate and you can get the financing, it might be worth some payday loans to move to Lake Elsinore. Lake Elsinore is a beautiful lakeside community in California.
I don't know how Dr. Singer can denie the allegations if the Tobacco Institute itself have memos or letter in their hand, that he did solicite fund for his studies. That is odd, he is soliciting in Tobacco institute for fund while his study is against Tobacco.
Fantastic article over Dr. S . Fred Singer. I need to know more about Dr. please keep us update. Excellent informative and interesting post, keep it up.
dissertation writing help | custom dissertation | dissertation help
More information please visit http://www.dissertationwriting-help.com
thanks
The short essay writing just about No apology is owed Dr. S. Fred Singer, and none will be forthcoming, you would see at the paper writing service. Purchase the essays or custom essay paper just about No apology is owed Dr. S. Fred Singer, and none will be forthcoming.
of course no apology is required for this crime. Criminal should be brought to justice
Custom Essay
Custom Essay
Software Development
How come he is not connected with tobacco industry?
He's got all these research papers, hasn't he?
_________________
Marketing Paper
I was just wandering through the internet and somehow got to this blog. This is a very nice blog with so many interesting articles and news. Keep posting such good contents.
lung cancer symptoms | bridal shower invitations
I couldn't agree with you more when you say there should be no doubt in this conversation where the weight of credibility lies.
Buy Hoodia | Sell my house fast
Last November more than 12,000 environmental scientists and practitioners participated in a survey conducted by the National Registry of Environmental Professionals (NREP). 41percent of the participants disagreed with the theory that our planet's recent warmth "can be, in large part, attributed to human activity”. That’s 5,033 professionals who agree with Singer.
This is dishonest.
Firstly, only 793 out of the 12,000 NERP members responded to the survey
Secondly, the figure you quote of 41percent is a derived figure from the reported:
"59 percent respond that current climactic activity exceeding norms calibrated by over 100 years of weather data collection can be, in large part, attributed to human activity".
So you are counting all the don't knows, or didn't respond, to that question as disagreeing. Why don't you just quote what the survey report says?
http://www.nrep.org/globsurv.htm
Well, to become a member of the NREP doesn't require any special education, or even particular knowledge.
Touting it as some authority on climate change really isn't credible. Who knows who has membership in the NREP, or what their mandate is viz-a-viz climate change.
I mean, questions on the "exam" include things like if you have 27 parts per billion = parts per million . . . and then they give you the answer!
The rest of the application process is just self-reporting along with a nice check to the organizers.
Your saying that enviromentalists lie and lie, but show no evidence to back your claim.
Further more you don't demonstrate what the profit is to the environmental side of the issue as opposed to the big oil companies.
Finally you use the term "Environmental agenda" as though the agenda of a clean earth is that evil.
What are you talking about! Where is Al Gore! He will not debate Singer, Monckton or Spencer! Next, the APS fraudently claimed Monckton's paper was not scientifically reviewed, dumb bell! In addition, the profit to the environmental side is through all of the alternative energy companies. Look where Al Gore, Pickens and Nancy Pelosi's monies are at, dumb bell! And we call it the "environmental agenda" because it is an agenda. The Democrats want to create a tax on carbon, and look into Barbara Boxer's dealings if you want to know more. I do not doubt that CO2 is bad in some ways but it does not heat the earth. I'd like to see someone talk about little things we can all do, like turning off the water in the shower while your putting soap on yourself.
Singer doesn't rely on factual data, he (his paycheque) relies on confusion and sowing doubt.
Don't worry, Toby. The operators of this website sure aren't, even if Dr. Singer DOES sue them and wins. They know they wont freeze to death at the bridge they'll be living under, because of the warmer temperatures we'll all be enjoying.
i agree with your these words.thesis "I don't care if what I say might cause the deaths and displacement of millions. I think what might console Singer is the idea that, if not him, someone else might have been commissioned to perpetrate the same lies. Singer,Research Paper responsibility falls on who takes the job. You're getting paid to lie about global warming and for that you will stand before God" Dissertation Writing
Where is Al Gore! He will not debate Singer, Monckton or Spencer! Next, the APS fraudently claimed Monckton's paper was not scientifically reviewed, dumb bell! In addition, the profit to the environmental side is through all of the alternative energy companies. Look where Al Gore, Pickens and Nancy Pelosi's monies are at, dumb bell! And we call it the "environmental agenda" because it is an agenda. organic fertilizer guide
Where is Al Gore! He will not debate Singer, Monckton or Spencer! Next, the APS fraudently claimed Monckton's paper was not scientifically reviewed, dumb bell! In addition, the profit to the environmental side is through all of the alternative energy companies. Look where Al Gore, Pickens and Nancy Pelosi's monies are at, dumb bell! And we call it the "environmental agenda" because it is an agenda. organic fertilizer guide
Trying to post a link but it does not working trying again..Term Papers
Good work!
Although the link to Gelbspan didn't complete when I tried it, the docs other links took me to showed that Singer did take money, apparently from tobacco think tanks, for studies on tobacco designed to exonerate it.
One handwritten note I saw had the tobacco exec suggesting a "social costs" line that Singer should take in the study.
To be fair, this guy called called him "very impressive."
Certainly makes it sound as if Singer's views were very flexible.
Whatever the cash called for.
Isn't there a word for that?
Good work!
Although the link to Gelbspan didn't complete when I tried it, the docs other links took me to showed that Singer did take money, apparently from tobacco think tanks, for studies on tobacco designed to exonerate it.
One handwritten note I saw had the tobacco exec suggesting a "social costs" line that Singer should take in the study.
To be fair, this guy called called him "very impressive."
Certainly makes it sound as if Singer's views were very flexible.
Whatever the cash called for.
Isn't there a word for that?
What IF Fred Singer's interpretation of the data is correct??? What if science prooves Singer right and EPA wrong? What if .....
"........ During the last 15 years, epidemiologic studies have been conducted on the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and lung cancer. Several authors and regulatory agencies have concluded that a causal link has been established [e.g., see (1-3)], whereas some authors consider that bias and confounding factors constitute a plausible explanation for the observed association [e.g., see (4)]. The available studies are-in most cases-too small to adequately assess the magnitude of the effect and to address specific aspects, such as the shape of the dose-response relationship, the effect of cessation of exposure, the importance of multiple sources of ETS exposure, and the interaction of ETS exposure with other risk factors of lung cancer. ......."
From a study (Oct 1998) heavily funded by several European governments and governmental organisations: http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/90/19/1440
And: Are you all too lazy to go through the arguments, epidemiological statistics, studies? Do it and you will be surprised.
Just like he was wrong when he proclaimed that the glaciers were not retreating.
But the real dinger is that it doesn't matter whether a guy like Fred Singer is wrong or not - he is doing his job of confusing the public regardless (unfortunately), because most people don't understand what he's really about.
By the way you present some pretty old research there (10 years old). Currently the medical concensus is that there is no safe level of ETS exposure.
Thanks to jerks like Fred Singer, progress in preventing smoking has been delayed by decades.
The same could be said for the "scientist" on the GW side. They receive large government grants to study the problem. If the problem is not really a problem, their meal ticket disappears. Regarding the IPCC report, 2000 scientist did sign on, but 17,000 scientist signed and sent a dissenting opinion. There has never been an honest debate, those who advance the theory of global warming simply put those who dissent into the camp of crackpots or say that they have been bought off. There is plenty of evidence to refute GW for those willing to look, but it's hard to find as it is not politically correct.
"...But the really big debate is why have we stuck with fossil fuels for so long when, used as prescribed, cause cancer, oil addiction, fuel wars, and fund an arms race. Renewable/sustainable energy is more reliable, cleaner, less expensive over the long run, and fosters independance from our friends the oil gaints..."
WAKE UP, PLEASE!
I recycle. I set the thermostat low in the winter, and high in the summer. I drive an economical automobile, yet... Please, kindly explain the connection between fossil fuels and arms race. Oh, by the way, which form of renewable energy is less expensive than fossil fuels? I know of none currently available that in the short or long run truly is. If an energy source were more financially sound than fossil fuels, our free market economy would have pick it up and ran with it. It would probably be the oil companies who would pioneer this unnamed technology to continue happily making money...
Hey guys, read the article in Newsweek about Global Warming and Fred Singer and his company. It's also about Exxon and other wonderful companies trying to deny what is happening. What is going to happen to my children when they finally arrive in this world? My grandchildren? Their children?! I'm only 21 and I have so much life to live. I'm getting married next weekend, I'm going to graduate college and I'm going to have a family. Then they are going to have a family but if that family is in danger for the future, I'm ready to fight NOW!
Global Warming caused by humans is not a theory of science. It is a fact! Stop denying it and do something about it! Today about 20 states are above 100 degrees. Check the weather.
People can try to justify their feelings about issues by trashing those who oppose them, but it doesn't change the facts. Singer has been 100% correct in his predictions (i.e. - debating Sagan on the potential effects of the Kuwaiti Oil Field Fires, etc). Singer deals in facts (actual data, not opinion). Scientific consensus on any issue means nothing. Science is not determined by consensus. In fact, every scientific discovery or breakthrough has been made by individuals swimming against the current of consensus. If "scientific consensus" supported Singer's views, it would have no more validity that it does supporting the idea that man can significantly affect the environment. If a supposed scientist is challenged on his views and responds with the defense that "the majority of scientists agree with me", then that person is no scientist. Opinions are irrelevant. No prediction has ever come true. Singer is probably being maligned because he threatens the billion dollar global warmimg scam.
I just have a couple of comments about this last post. I feel it is very dangerous to discredit the entire scientific community in favor of one scientist, credible or not. Also, it is not as if the "current" has been GW is a reality and we are the cause. If any analogy is appropriate, it is that for decades, the popular scientific opinion has been that of Singer, that people could not possible have so large an impact on the environment as to cause GW. With evidence, much as was the case when we were in a geocentric model and switched to a heliocentric model, scientists began accepting that we are in fact capable of such climate changes. I just wanted to keep everyone straight in this argument. Let's be careful when trying to support our opinions and feelings on a topic not to bring it somewhere ugly. Let's do our best to back up what we say with sources and facts that can be checked and recited.
How do I begin this, I wonder? Over the years I have gone back and forth in my thinking about global warming, but, though I believe in environmental safeguards and conservation, and all that, I'm not so cock-sure that man is the cause of global warming at all. I read an article in The Nation by Alexander Cockburn entitled "Is Global Warming a Sin?" In it, this "leftist" writer goes against the whole "greenhouse establishment" line generally, though not specifically, endorsed by that magazine's editors. His back-up expert is a Dr. Martin Herzberg who is a combustion research scientist and was a U.S. Navy meteorologist. After reading it, and thinking about it a bit, I decided 'Wait, hold it a minute. Perhaps I should get off the GW (not George Dubya) bandwagon, and take another look.' My own degree is a 4-year degree in Geography, and it really does seem that "greenhouser scientists" (all these labels!) go off the deep end in predicting how much of a disaster global warming is going to be in not so very many years. Well, I guess what I'm trying to say, folks, is let's not get into the routine practice of slandering an individual's character, and look at the facts as they come to light, objectively. I think this whole subject has become way too highly politicized, perhaps like just about everything else in this skewered society. But I think this really is an issue for the scientists, not Rush Limbaugh vs. Al Gore. Sheesh!
And a few days ago, Anne Marie, the last commercial apple orchard in the town I live in had temperatures in the twenties, and lost their entire crop! Do you think that proves anything for the future? Man's causing global warming has not been proven, though there are certainly a lot of other things that your children will have to deal with. I say "Cork the stork!"
I have news for Mike. While some of us are enjoying ALL the advantages of living in the 21st century, there are many others whose living conditions are sub-standard enough that someone from the 2nd century might feel quite at home among them. However, they might also notice a greater amount of despair.
irredressibility herpetomonas dehiscence crocheting sillily crash bisonant uncommunicably
40488
http://www.freewebs.com/wluqpg/1.html
irredressibility herpetomonas dehiscence crocheting sillily crash bisonant uncommunicably
Natural Sea Salt
http://www.angelfire.com/gvejecqt/1k7.html
Register A New Business Name
http://www.angelfire.com/bpdegmyz/fi.html
Steps To Getting Married In California
http://www.angelfire.com/dxiduhbo/178.html
Lord Of The Rings Chess Set
http://www.angelfire.com/vdhltoxc/nb.html
Atv Dump Trailer
http://www.angelfire.com/qhkojbrr/2rg.html
Tracker Boat Seats
http://www.angelfire.com/lbhovjzm/4tj.html
Soldering Iron Holders
http://www.angelfire.com/qgmbnflt/2cd.html
Iiird Time Out
http://www.angelfire.com/ddqaquck/26y.html
Oregon Golf Posters
http://www.angelfire.com/dxiduhbo/5fw.html
Camera Canon Digital Powershot S Camera
http://www.angelfire.com/iyemnmmj/ht.html
Mom Son Gallery
http://www.angelfire.com/qgmbnflt/3n7.html
Ultra Lite Planes
http://www.angelfire.com/ymcpwche/1af.html
Nfl Kids Apparel
http://www.angelfire.com/qgmbnflt/640.html
Tom Cruise Gallery
http://www.angelfire.com/nefetljn/1vh.html
New Orleans House Of Blues
http://www.angelfire.com/dawdndsu/ki.html
Blue And Gray Magazine
http://www.angelfire.com/vdhltoxc/3uu.html
Thc Panic Attacks
http://www.angelfire.com/ymcpwche/25w.html
Skin Problems In Cats
http://www.angelfire.com/bpdegmyz/3xs.html
Channel 12 News Phoenix
http://www.angelfire.com/rpdhcsbe/3ou.html
Babies R Us Store
http://www.angelfire.com/ymcpwche/5am.html
Driveway Security Alarms
http://www.angelfire.com/ymcpwche/4kr.html
Cgi Proxy Ss L For Facebook
http://www.angelfire.com/vdhltoxc/4e5.html
Church Of Christ Outreach Programs
http://www.angelfire.com/qhkojbrr/5zk.html
Chase Gold Visa
http://www.angelfire.com/nefetljn/3un.html
Belagio Hotel And Casino
http://www.angelfire.com/nixvpdeu/5hx.html
Jura-capresso Automatic Coffee Makers
http://www.angelfire.com/nefetljn/4ba.html
Computer Financing With No Credit Check
http://www.angelfire.com/urrxboyi/1nj.html
Full Sheet Sets
http://www.angelfire.com/qhkojbrr/1sg.html
Beautiful Butterfly Poem
http://www.angelfire.com/bpdegmyz/m8.html
Stylus Engraving Cell Structure
http://www.angelfire.com/nefetljn/3m.html
irredressibility herpetomonas dehiscence crocheting sillily crash bisonant uncommunicably
Ana Code Of Ethics For Nurses
http://www.angelfire.com/ybyffstw/1qw.html
irredressibility herpetomonas dehiscence crocheting sillily crash bisonant uncommunicably
Illegal Cp
http://www.angelfire.com/wgrgm/lxb.html